1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2005 Volvo S80
To start off, 2005 Volvo S80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S80 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2005 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Lite Ace | S80 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2922 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1679 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1440 mm |