1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Toyota | Saturn |
Model | Lite Ace | Outlook |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3564 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 277 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |