1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze weights approximately 286 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2013 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Lite Ace | Cruze |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1476 mm |