1989 Toyota Model F vs. 2013 Hyundai Tucson
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Tucson is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Hyundai Tucson is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Hyundai Tucson (174 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Model F. (79 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Tucson should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Hyundai Tucson weights approximately 282 kg more than 1989 Toyota Model F. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Hyundai Tucson is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota Model F. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Tucson will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Hyundai Tucson (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Hyundai Tucson will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Model F. 2013 Hyundai Tucson has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Model F has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Model F will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Hyundai Tucson will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Toyota Model F | 2013 Hyundai Tucson | |
| Make | Toyota | Hyundai |
| Model | Model F | Tucson |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1582 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1655 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2640 mm |
