1989 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Zastava 103 (59 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103 should accelerate faster than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Zastava 103 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Zastava 103 (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (76 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Zastava 103 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications: