1989 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (76 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Volkswagen Polo | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
Model | Polo | Colorado |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 76 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |