1989 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 611 kg more than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (76 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Volkswagen Polo | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Polo | C30 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 76 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
