1989 Volvo 245 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 245 (110 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1989 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Volvo 245 (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Volvo 245 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Volvo | Mazda |
| Model | 245 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2316 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2489 mm |
