1989 Volvo 760 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,314 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 760 (163 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1989 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Volvo 760 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 760 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2314 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2490 mm |