1989 ZIL 4104 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Acura CL. (260 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura CL.
Because 1989 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 ZIL 4104 | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | ZIL | Acura |
| Model | 4104 | CL |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7690 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 312 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 607 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2100 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 2580 mm |
