1990 Acura Integra vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1990 Acura Integra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1990 Acura Integra. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1990 Acura Integra.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Acura Integra | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Acura | Lincoln |
Model | Integra | Continental |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3210 mm |