1990 Acura Integra vs. 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Acura Integra (158 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Because 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Acura Integra | 1998 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | Integra | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1990 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1960 mm |