1990 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Acura Integra. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1990 Acura Integra.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Acura Integra | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | Integra | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 191 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
