1990 Acura Integra vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Acura Integra would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Acura Integra | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | Integra | Cima |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |