1990 Acura Integra vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Acura Integra (158 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Toyota MR2. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota MR2.
Because 2004 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Acura Integra | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | Integra | MR2 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.2 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |