1990 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 971 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lincoln |
Model | 164 | Continental |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3210 mm |