1990 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 (264 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 164 | Rustler |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 264 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 232 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |