1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1952 Ferrari 212
To start off, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,561 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212.
Because 1952 Ferrari 212 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 212. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1952 Ferrari 212 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari |
| Model | 33 | 212 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1712 cc | 2561 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 58.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 159 L |
