1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 104 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 430 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 33 | 6C |
Year Released | 1990 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |