1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1964 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 240 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1964 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1964 Jaguar E-Type | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 33 | E-Type |
Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1712 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2440 mm |