1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (83 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 131 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 (178 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | 33 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.2 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1171 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
