1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (127 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (149 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 33 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1712 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 132 L |