1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (83 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 988 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (430 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (178 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 33 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1777 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.2 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 100 L |
