1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (148 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (320 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (148 Nm). This means 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 has manual transmission. 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
| Model | 33 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1712 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
