1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (87 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (113 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 33 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 57 L |