1990 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. (178 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alfa Romeo 33. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 has manual transmission. 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 33 | Calais |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1777 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |