1990 Alpine V6 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Alpine V6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Alpine V6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1990 Alpine V6. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1990 Alpine V6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 440 kg more than 1990 Alpine V6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Alpine V6. (298 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Alpine V6.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Alpine V6 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alpine | Renault |
Model | V6 | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |