1990 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 100 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Audi 100 weights approximately 490 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 100 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 100 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | 100 | Nano |
Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |