1990 Audi 200 vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1990 Audi 200.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1949 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | 200 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1695 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3000 mm |
