1990 Audi 200 vs. 1950 Maserati 8CLT
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 2,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 8CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Audi 200 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1950 Maserati 8CLT.
Because 1950 Maserati 8CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 8CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1950 Maserati 8CLT | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | 200 | 8CLT |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 424 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
