1990 Audi 200 vs. 1953 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1990 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1953 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | 200 | T 26 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |