1990 Audi 200 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1990 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
