1990 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1964 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Audi | Isuzu |
| Model | 200 | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
