1990 Audi 200 vs. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (166 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
Model | 200 | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 146 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 166 Nm |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2340 mm |