1990 Audi 200 vs. 1966 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1966 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 200 | MK X |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2900 mm |
