1990 Audi 200 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
| Model | 200 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 163 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2190 mm |
