1990 Audi 200 vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (162 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. 1975 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1990 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |