1990 Audi 200 vs. 1982 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200. 1982 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1982 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2950 mm |