1990 Audi 200 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 200 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |
