1990 Audi 200 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Audi 200 weights approximately 214 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (252 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | C 52 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |