1990 Audi 200 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford e-Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 200 | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
