1990 Audi 200 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200. 2002 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | 200 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2720 mm |
