1990 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Ford Puma. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Puma.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Puma. (149 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 2004 Ford Puma | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Puma |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |