1990 Audi 200 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (208 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 208 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |
