1990 Audi 200 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8. 2009 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2710 mm |