1990 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (305 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Audi | Kia |
| Model | 200 | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 17.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
