1990 Audi 200 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Jeep Compass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Audi 200 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | 200 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2634 mm |
