1990 Audi 200 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2600 mm |