1990 Audi 80 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1990 Audi 80 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1990 Audi 80. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1990 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 80 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | 62 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |