1990 Audi 90 vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1990 Audi 90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (168 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1990 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 90.
Because 1982 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 90 | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Audi | Pontiac |
Model | 90 | Firebird |
Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |